AI Teading - TeensTry AI for yourself

AI Teading - Teens

What we checked

Where the old stories came from — and how far we actually checked each one

What we checked

Where the old stories and the numbers in this guide came from. Each chapter also carries its own short list at the bottom of the page.

What the guide says

The last column is how far we got. Read the original means we opened that paper or record ourselves; checked via a quotation means we confirmed it from another work that reproduced the original wording.

ChapterWhat the guide saysSourceHow far we got
1.1In the 1980s people typed in thousands of rules by hand, and factories and companies really ran on themchecked via a quotation16checked via a quotation
1.1As the rules piled up, keeping them grew bigger than writing themchecked via a quotation17checked via a quotation
1.2A checkers program started beating the person who built it — after eight or ten hours of machine-playing timeread the original abstract only · pp. 601–6026 7read the original abstract only · pp. 601–602
1.3The phrase "artificial intelligence" was first used in 1955, in a plan built around a single summerread the original full text5read the original full text
1.3The idea of computing by imitating nerve cells dates from the 1940schecked via a quotation1checked via a quotation
1.3A machine built on that idea came in the 1950schecked via a quotation8checked via a quotation
1.3The learning machine made of matchboxes is from the 1960schecked via a quotation10checked via a quotation
1.3A way to teach many layers stacked together spread in the 1980schecked via a quotation29checked via a quotation
1.3Seven prediction cards — things people actually said about what would happen whenchecked via a quotation23 3 24 8 25 26 5checked via a quotation
2.1The first digital photograph, in 1957, was 176 squares on a side — about thirty thousand in allread the original full text20read the original full text
2.2People designed a whole new typeface just so machines could read itchecked via a quotation15checked via a quotation
2.2Reading handwriting stayed unsolved for more than forty years — commercial readers of printed text arrived in the mid-1950s, handwritten postal addresses were read for real in 1997checked via a quotation28 27checked via a quotation
2.3The method published in 2001 made face-finding about fifteen times faster — the paper reports 15 frames a second on 384×288 images. That the previous method took about a second a frame is our own arithmetic from those two figuresread the original abstract and conclusion19read the original abstract and conclusion
2.3The little box around faces appeared on cameras in the mid-2000schecked via a quotation21checked via a quotation
2.4The first speech recogniser, in 1952, knew ten digits — and only in one set voicechecked via a quotation4checked via a quotation
2.41990s dictation software made you read set sentences aloud before it would workchecked via a quotation22checked via a quotation
3.1About seventy years ago came a machine taught by cards instead of written ruleschecked via a quotation8checked via a quotation
3.2A machine imitating the brain was announced in 1958, to enormous expectationschecked via a quotation8checked via a quotation
3.2Eleven years later two researchers proved that a single straight line can't separate even a very simple arrangementchecked via a quotation13checked via a quotation
3.2How to teach those extra layers was worked out in the 1980schecked via a quotation29checked via a quotation
3.4A machine that learned without a computer — 304 matchboxes and coloured beadschecked via a quotation10checked via a quotation
4.1When computers first handled letters, people settled on 128 of themchecked via a quotation9checked via a quotation
4.1A way to hold every letter in the world took about thirty years to arrivechecked via a quotation9 18checked via a quotation
4.2Opening a book at random and writing down the next word was enough to produce something that looked like Englishread the original §3, pp. 7–82read the original §3, pp. 7–8
4.4A 1966 program that did nothing but find a keyword and ask backread the original p. 3611read the original p. 36
4.4His secretary asked him to leave the room — he wrote it down himselfread the original p. 47712read the original p. 477
4.4Its author went on to become one of AI's sharpest criticschecked via a quotation14checked via a quotation
6.1In 1950 a mathematician asked how we would know whether a machine thinkschecked via a quotation3checked via a quotation
6.1Telling a person from a machine by conversation alone has now become very hard — in a study where people talked for five minutes to a human and a machine side by side, the machine was picked as the human more often than the human wasread the original abstract only30read the original abstract only

What the labs are made of

ChapterLabWhat it's made of
2.2H1Weights we trained ourselves. We drew the training characters too
2.2P2·P3Photos that need no credit line (CC0 · public domain · Pexels)
2.2P3The response maps come from running the photos through a pre-trained network. We don't ship the weights
2.3H11OpenCV's frontal face detector (BSD-3 · Apache-2.0). We didn't touch the numbers
2.3H11·P4Three stand-in videos we made ourselves. The screen says they were made with AI
2.3P4MediaPipe face, hand and pose (Apache-2.0), bundled so nothing is fetched from elsewhere
2.4H12·P5The prepared voices are computer-made, and the screen says so
3.1P6MediaPipe only turns the photo into numbers. The last layer — the one that decides what it is — you train that one here
3.3P8Sixty photos gathered with backgrounds deliberately split (Pexels), checked by eye
4.1P12Cutting rules we built ourselves from the old stories used in 4.2
4.2H5·P13Out-of-copyright old stories — Bang Jeong-hwan, Joseph Jacobs, Hans Christian Andersen, Kusuyama Masao
4.2P13A small language model we trained on those stories. No borrowed weights
4.3P14Numbers only, pulled from a multilingual language model. The screen says a person picked one map out of 144
5.1P18·P19Output from a picture machine we trained on pictures we drew in code
5.3P21Reuses the pictures from 5.1. Nothing new was made
5.3H9The photos laid over each other are public-domain and CC0 files already in use

What we measured

Not literature — numbers we took ourselves. Most of them the labs put on screen as they run.

ChapterLabWhat we measured
2.3H11We timed the stretch where the 2001 method loses the face, then made sure the lab runs through it
2.4H12·P5Measured by enrolling the ready-made voice and testing all nine. Korean: the enrolled voice six times, another voice twice. English: nine and four. Japanese: eight and two. Spanish: nine and four — English digit words sound so unlike each other that the gap narrows
3.3P8Taught on set A it gets 9 of 12; taught on set B, all 12. The three it misses are always the swapped-background photos. The lab shows this on screen
4.1P12How differently a language gets cut up is something the lab counts on the spot and shows you
4.2H5·P13Counting three words back, 33% of what it writes is copied straight from this book. The trained side: 0%. (The Korean storybook comes out at about 60% — those tales repeat more. Japanese counts single characters, and eight characters back gives 54%; the trained side is 0% there too)
4.3P14Six of the seven sentences we score come out right. The eighth splits people too, so it isn't scored. The number on screen is a different one — how often you and the machine agreed
5.1P18·P19The screen says it's a 32-square machine, which is why you can see the blocks

Parts 5 and 6 have almost nothing to cite. What to hand to an AI, how your own data gets used, which rules you'll hold yourself to — no paper has the answer written down. Which is why those chapters ask rather than answer.

Sources

  1. McCulloch & Pitts, "A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity", Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5 (1943) checked via a quotation doi:10.1007/BF02478259
  2. Shannon, "A Mathematical Theory of Communication", Bell System Technical Journal 27 (1948) read the original §3, pp. 7–8 doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  3. Turing, "Computing Machinery and Intelligence", Mind 59(236) (1950) checked via a quotation doi:10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433
  4. Davis, Biddulph & Balashek, "Automatic Recognition of Spoken Digits", Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(6) (1952) checked via a quotation doi:10.1121/1.1906946
  5. McCarthy, Minsky, Rochester & Shannon, "A Proposal for the Dartmouth Summer Research Project on Artificial Intelligence" (1955) read the original full text open
  6. Samuel, "Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers", IBM Journal of Research and Development 3(3) (1959) read the original abstract only doi:10.1147/rd.33.0210
  7. Samuel, "Some Studies in Machine Learning Using the Game of Checkers. II — Recent Progress", IBM Journal of Research and Development 11(6) (1967) read the original pp. 601–602 doi:10.1147/rd.116.0601
  8. "New Navy Device Learns By Doing", The New York Times (1958-07-08) checked via a quotation open
  9. ASA X3.4-1963 — American Standard Code for Information Interchange checked via a quotation open
  10. Michie, MENACE (1961) · "Experiments on the Mechanization of Game-Learning", The Computer Journal 6(3) (1963) checked via a quotation doi:10.1093/comjnl/6.3.232
  11. Weizenbaum, "ELIZA — A Computer Program For the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man And Machine", Communications of the ACM 9(1) (1966) read the original p. 36 doi:10.1145/365153.365168
  12. Weizenbaum, "Contextual Understanding by Computers", Communications of the ACM 10(8) (1967) read the original p. 477 doi:10.1145/363534.363545
  13. Minsky & Papert, Perceptrons (MIT Press, 1969) checked via a quotation open
  14. Weizenbaum, Computer Power and Human Reason (W. H. Freeman, 1976) checked via a quotation open
  15. OCR-A (American Type Founders, 1968) · ANSI X3.17-1981 · ISO 1073-1 checked via a quotation open
  16. McDermott, "R1: A Rule-Based Configurer of Computer Systems" (1980) · Barker & O'Connor, Communications of the ACM 32(3) (1989) checked via a quotation doi:10.1145/62065.62067
  17. Soloway, Bachant & Jensen, "Assessing the Maintainability of XCON-in-RIME" (1987) checked via a quotation open
  18. The Unicode Standard, Version 1.0 (1991) checked via a quotation open
  19. Viola & Jones, "Rapid Object Detection using a Boosted Cascade of Simple Features", CVPR 2001 read the original abstract and conclusion doi:10.1109/CVPR.2001.990517
  20. NIST, "First Digital Image" · "Fiftieth Anniversary of First Digital Image Marked" (2007) read the original full text open
  21. Fujifilm, "FinePix S6500fd" press release and specifications (2006-07-13) — the first Fujifilm camera with face detection checked via a quotation open
  22. IBM ViaVoice user guide — "Enrollment" (reading set sentences to train the recogniser on one voice), 1990s editions checked via a quotation
  23. Simon, The New Science of Management Decision (Harper & Row, 1960 · 1965) checked via a quotation open
  24. George Johnson, "To Test a Powerful Computer, Play an Ancient Game" (interview with Piet Hut), The New York Times (1997-07-29) checked via a quotation open
  25. Moravec, Mind Children (Harvard University Press, 1988) checked via a quotation open
  26. Hofstadter, Gödel, Escher, Bach (Basic Books, 1979) checked via a quotation open
  27. United States Postal Service, 1997 Annual Report, p.43 — the Remote Computer Reader, built on University at Buffalo (CEDAR) handwritten address interpretation checked via a quotation open
  28. OCR trade histories on the first commercial installations (Shepard / Intelligent Machines Research Corp. at Reader's Digest, mid-1950s) — decade only; no primary source located checked via a quotation
  29. Rumelhart, Hinton & Williams, "Learning representations by back-propagating errors", Nature 323 (1986) checked via a quotation doi:10.1038/323533a0
  30. Jones & Bergen, "Large Language Models Pass the Turing Test", arXiv:2503.23674 (2025-03-31) read the original abstract only open